24 million homes need greening up to meet 2050 targets 14.04.09
It would take 23,000 teams of people working for 500 months to make the necessary energy efficiency alterations to the 24 million existing houses that will be standing in 2050 if UK is to meet national and international emissions targets,says the new ‘How people use and ’misuse’ buildings report’ from the ESRC.
A new joint Economic and Social Research Council and Technology Strategy Board publication highlights the need to focus on improving the energy efficiency of millions of buildings in Britain that will still be standing in 2050. How people use and ’misuse’ buildings coincides with a report from the House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee which calls on the government to make retrofitting existing buildings a priority in the Government’s £535 million green stimulus plan.
The publication, which accompanies a seminar organised jointly with the Technology Strategy Board, says that twenty-seven per cent of UK carbon emissions come from domestic buildings - twice the emissions of commercial and public buildings and five times that of industrial buildings.
The Government has targets for all new homes to be zero carbon by 2016, but existing buildings will need to be radically refurbished if we are to meet national and international emissions targets, the report says. According to Professor Kevin Lomas, University of Loughborough, virtually all the 24 million existing buildings in the UK would need some attention to reduce their emissions by just 40 per cent. ’To complete the task in 40 years we would need to refurbish an entire city the size of Cambridge every month. If we assume that each intervention would take a team of trained workers two weeks, we would need 23,000 teams of people to work at this rate non-stop for the next 500 months,’ he warns.
Large-scale refurbishment is only part of the answer. The effectiveness of energy-saving technologies, such as digital heat controls and meters, ultimately depends on human behaviour. Dr David Shipworth, University College, London, explains that the occupants of buildings do not always understand or use these devices in the way their designers intended.
’Our research shows that there is a surprisingly poor relationship between reported thermostat settings and recorded temperature in people’s homes, and that timers on central heating systems tend to increase hours of heating system use rather than reduce them as policy makers have assumed.’ He says that policymakers urgently need more research based on real energy use in real homes to test and support their ideas.
Professor Elizabeth Shove, University of Lancaster, says that it is vital to understand the notion of comfort, which is widely taken to be a 22ºC indoor climate all year round, irrespective of the weather outside. ’This is not set in stone,’ she says. ’It is sometimes assumed that comfort is something basic, physiological or natural. However, people in different cultures and at different points in history have reported being comfortable at a very much wider range of temperatures than that which we take to be ’normal’ in the UK today.’
Research has shown a huge variety in energy use in different homes with a relatively small number of households consuming very large amounts of energy. But the publication stresses that it is a mistake to assume that people deliberately squander electricity or hot water. ’High-energy consumption is more likely to be the result of a series of benign lifestyle decisions, like buying a plasma screen TV or taking up a particular hobby,’ says Professor Kevin Lomas.
- Marine Ingredients in Cosmetics: Sustainability Implications
- Organic farming enhances soil carbon stocks
- Harriet Lamb Appointed New CEO Of Fairtrade International
- Government failing in ambition to be ’greenest ever’
- Sweatshop Campaigners unite against Adidas’ "Fundamentally flawed" workers rights summit
- Improving Yields and Destroying the Environment